Relationship between fork length (FL) at capture and (A) otolith size
4.6 (266) · $ 23.50 · In stock
Download scientific diagram | Relationship between fork length (FL) at capture and (A) otolith size (OS) measured across transverse sections and (B) scale size (SS) measured from the focus to the anterior edge. Regression lines depict linear (dashed lines) and logarithmic fits (solid lines). For A, linear: OS = 1.89 + 0.09 · FL, r 2 = 0.94; log: OS = 3.29 · log e FL – 6.32, r 2 = 0.95. For B, linear: SS = –0.12 + 0.07 · FL, r 2 = 0.88; log: SS = 2.38 · log e FL – 6.07, r 2 = 0.89. from publication: Longitudinal Length Back-Calculations from Otoliths and Scales Differ Systematically in Haddock | Parallel macrostructure analysis of otoliths versus scales was conducted on Georges Bank Haddock Melanogrammus aeglefinus sampled in spring 2011 to test whether annuli widths of both structures yield comparable estimates of back-calculated length at age. While generally | Otolith, Otolithic Membrane and Fish | ResearchGate, the professional network for scientists.
Relationship between fork length (FL) at capture and (A) otolith size
Relationship between fork length (FL) at capture and (A) otolith
Sebastes diploproa hi-res stock photography and images - Alamy
Robert DeVries - Instructional Assistant Professor - University of
Christian MÖLLMANN, Professor, Prof. Dr., University of Hamburg, Hamburg, UHH, Institute for Marine Ecosystem and Fisheries Science
Age and Growth of Southern Bluefin Tuna, Thunnus maccoyii, Based
Otolith shape
CSIRO PUBLISHING Marine and Freshwater Research
Queen triggerfish Balistes vetula: Validation of otolith-based age
Percentage of otoliths with opaque edge at age 3 and 6 in the central
Linking variation in planktonic primary production to coral reef
Larval and juvenile Longfin Smelt diets as a function of fish size
Frontiers Length-Weight Relationships and Otolith-Based Growth
Monthly percentage of opaque edges observed in modern samples of
