• Home
• thinx menstrual underwear
• Thinx period underwear was supposed to be 'non-toxic'. Now customers feel betrayed

Thinx period underwear was supposed to be 'non-toxic'. Now customers feel betrayed

4.8 (575) · $ 12.99 · In stock

Thinx settles lawsuit over 'forever chemicals' in period underwear

Should I be worried about toxic chemicals and Thinx?

😷 on X: IF YOU ARE USING @Thinx period panties STOP USING THEM NOW!!! Thinx is essentially admitting to wrongdoing by settling a case in which plaintiffs found (through independent testing) toxic

Period underwear - Wikipedia

Thinx period underwear was supposed to be 'non-toxic'. Now customers feel betrayed

Ninety years since the first Tampax, why aren't there better menstrual products?, Menstruation

No reward for leaning in: the workplace toll of emotional labor, Women

MawingBedlam

Thinx period underwear was supposed to be 'non-toxic'. Now customers feel betrayed

Safest Period Underwear Tested for Indications of PFAS -- Guide

Period Underwear Brand Thinx Settles $5million Lawsuit Over Potentially Harmful Chemicals In Menstrual Pants

Thinx period underwear settles class action lawsuit over possibly causing fertility issues

thinx Cheap Sell - OFF 63%

Australian period underwear makers deny using 'forever chemicals' after Thinx settles suit in US, PFAS

East coast features, Page 18 of 38